Op-Ed: Islip Supervisor Seeks Input on Budgetary Challenges

Tom Croci outlines steps Town has taken to close its budget gap but also wants feedback from local residents on what steps to take in the future.

Editor's note: The following was submitted to Patch by Islip Town Supervisor Tom Croci. The opinions in the piece are those of Croci and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of Patch.

I have been privileged these past eight months to travel around our Town as Supervisor and represent the hard working families of Islip.  When I took office, I pledged that the Town Board and I would face the tough challenges head on.  The state of our Town’s finances was far greater than anyone could have foreseen.  As many of you are aware by now, we are trying to in our 2013 budget, which was caused by the reckless spending, and poor judgment by the prior administration and Supervisor.  

After two consecutive years of depleting our fund balance, we are left with few choices to balance our budget and prevent economic catastrophe in our town.  In order to continue the services which Islip residents deserve, the town will need to be funded at a certain level.  Islip residents have expressed to us repeatedly what they have come to expect in the way of services and facilities, but we need to have a frank conversation about the face and future of our town and what that will cost.

Upon taking office, the Town Board cut an entire department of the government and reorganized others, we cut executive salaries, we sold town property and are placing it back on the tax rolls, we are reducing the number and cost of town buildings, we cracked down on absentee landlords and code violators, we eliminated $1 million in capital projects that were set to be completed this year, and we used zero based budgeting to reduce town wide budgets by $3 million for 2013.  We have set the town on a course to be more efficient and more profitable in the coming years.  However, 2013 will require sacrifice and hard choices. 

We have cut our government down to the bone, but it is not enough.  Are residents willing to accept a mass reduction of Town employees which would result in decreased services and speed of response from Town departments? Do you think that we should halt our road paving and drainage projects indefinitely? Should we close our pools, ocean and bay beaches and parks?  Should we raise fees for permits and all services?  Are residents prepared to pay an extra $10 or $15 per month to sustain Town operations and current services? 

This is a decision that our community must make together.  This is OUR town. Tell us what you think. 

Sidney Beane September 26, 2012 at 04:42 PM
Tom Croci claims that a cut in the Town workforce would decrease services and response times from Town departments. First off, the services the Town employees provide are marginal at best. Any type of job that requires work to be done from the Parks Department or DPW will be surely half-assed and take twice as long as decent hard workers would provide. Second, reducing response times is a joke, because the Town response times are already a joke. Thirdly; closing the pools, beaches, & parks should not be a concern. Casamento is a shack with a cracked pool that requires constant maintenance (money pit), Byron is a mosquito infested lagoon, & Timberline is located in Brentwood (need I say more?). Ronkonkoma lake is filled with bacteria and should never be swam in, & the Bayshore spray park is a multi million dollar investment that is part of your $26 million dollar deficit. The only service that is important is the road maintenance and the drainage, which should take priority over the other services anyway.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something