Vote For Jennifer Maertz in the Democratic Primary

Winning an election can't be just about the money!

Last night I went to the Maertz-Fleming debate held at the Rocky Point VFW Hall by the League of Women Voters. Maertz and Fleming are running in the Democratic primary.  Each of them hopes to be running against Ken Lavalle in November.

 I went with an open mind but came out certain that my vote would go to Jennifer Maertz. When asked what makes each of them the better candidate to run against Senator LaValle, Fleming’s pat answer was “I can raise more money.” Where Maertz gave several budget reform initiatives she would support at the state level, Fleming repeatedly told us how much money she has raised so far in comparison to how much Maertz has raised. Fleming also told us about a New York City PAC that supports her, but what also came out was that this group approached Maertz first and Maertz declined because she refused to promise allegiance to their cause. On many issues the two agree: They both support getting rid of the MTA tax, they both want to encourage businesses to LI, and they both support the public finance bill. So, Ms. Fleming, who should we vote for: You because you’ve been able to raise more money or Maertz, who gave specific issues on how to solve some of the problems in our district and has shown that she will not be beholding to any special-interest group.  I think the answer is clear.

 Yes, it does take money to win an election, but it takes more than that to serve. It takes a commitment to the district that person will represent. So, let’s put Jennifer Maertz on the Democratic ticket and then give her the money she needs to win the general election.

Maertz came very close to beating LaValle two years ago when she stepped up only two months before the election to fill Calcaterra’s place when she was disqualified. Even with very little time and support she gave him a run for HIS MONEY. Please don’t tell me it’s all about the money. The voters are smarter than that!

 Vote for Jennifer Maertz on the Democratic primary on Sept. 13.  

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

EJ Lopez September 01, 2012 at 11:40 AM
I wasnt able to go to the debate, but have read about the two candidates and both seem fine to me. The bottom line is we need someone who can defeat Sen. LaValle. I promised myself to work for his defeat when he voted against marriage equality. Im still undecided as I really think both candidates are well qualified...but LaValle MUST go...also im interested to know what "super pac" is supporting Fleming?
christine September 02, 2012 at 03:20 AM
EJ--- http://www.facebook.com/nobadapples
christine September 02, 2012 at 03:22 AM
EJ---- an article about it--- http://www.cityandstateny.com/bad-apples-pac-endorses-bridget-fleming-ken-lavalle-long-island/
Ernestine Franco September 02, 2012 at 12:52 PM
EJ Lopez, I agree with you that LaValle must go! The two preceding comments have given links to info about the No Bad Apples NYC PAC. My understanding is that this NYC-based PAC supporting Fleming is run by a NYC Senator. It alleges to have a "good government" purpose, pointed out during the debate. This Senator or her PAC has not spoken out against one of her own NYC Senate Democratic colleagues that was just indicted this past week. Maertz stated that, when she spoke to them, she was told that if she wanted their support she would be expected to pledge loyalty to the same NYC Centric conference that forced the MTA payroll tax on Suffolk County taxpayers and now has had four of its members or former members indicted or convicted this year. One sitting NYC Democratic Senator was indicted this week alone according to what Maertz mentioned at the debate. Fleming did not deny that the NYC Democrats were associated with these things.
Ernestine Franco September 02, 2012 at 12:52 PM
I didn’t see the South Hampton debate but it was reported that Fleming stated in that debate that even though she is for marriage equality, if a majority of the district is not in favor of it she would "adjust" to the majority. When her Southampton argument against Maertz was brought up at the Rocky Point debate, she at first made it appear she was changing her opinion but ultimately still said you need to look to the voters’ opinion on all issues, including civil rights issues, in this case marriage equality. That was a big disagreement between the candidates. Maertz said that on human rights issues one has to vote one’s conscience. And I agree with Jennifer Maertz.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »